dollar500
08-07 06:32 PM
I know it's a naive question...but i can't guess...Is it last Update?
wallpaper DailyBunker » Lindsay Lohan#39;s
WeShallOvercome
11-20 01:55 PM
what does it mean? If you apply your 485 on July 2nd, within 6 months time (by Jan 2nd) you will get 485 approved?
This question has been asked 100000000 times..
your I-485 will be adjudicated in 6 months IF and ONLY IF your PD is current and your security checks are cleared. Without these 2 conditions, the processing times are pretty much useless for us.
This question has been asked 100000000 times..
your I-485 will be adjudicated in 6 months IF and ONLY IF your PD is current and your security checks are cleared. Without these 2 conditions, the processing times are pretty much useless for us.
bidhanc
07-29 07:16 AM
If your Husband's GC was approved and it was a straight forward case, yours should be approved also.
I would suggest taking an "infopass" and checking on the status of your case.
thank u so much for ur prompt reply.
my husband's priority date is current now so are there any chances for me to get gc now??
I would suggest taking an "infopass" and checking on the status of your case.
thank u so much for ur prompt reply.
my husband's priority date is current now so are there any chances for me to get gc now??
2011 lindsay lohan miami wardrobe
cr125rider
04-16 01:45 AM
That is the sprite of link walking right, this one is a WIP, got some font and organization issues. Thanks for the condtructive feedback RadioactiveChimp *sarcasm*. Thanks Kman.
more...
hybrid101
04-02 10:10 AM
loved the "write a letter to become a mod" april fool joke the best:lol:
apatel_17
03-28 08:37 AM
Since Senate passed the CIR bill last year, is it necessary for the Senate to pass a bill again this year?
If the House manages to pass CIR this year, wouldn't a committee (Senate & House members) meet and chalk of the difference and come to a common ground?
Pending legislation from last year were part of a different congress (house+senate), and all bills from last congress, that failed to become law, expired at the beginning of this year when a new Congress took charge. That's why CIR is being re-introduced in both the house and senate.
If the House manages to pass CIR this year, wouldn't a committee (Senate & House members) meet and chalk of the difference and come to a common ground?
Pending legislation from last year were part of a different congress (house+senate), and all bills from last congress, that failed to become law, expired at the beginning of this year when a new Congress took charge. That's why CIR is being re-introduced in both the house and senate.
more...
Blog Feeds
08-26 07:30 PM
Great Analysis from AILA to share with our readers. PL 111-230 requires the submission of an additional fee of $2,000 for certain H-1B petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) and $2,250 for certain L-1A (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137416.html) and L-1B petitions postmarked on or after August 14, 2010. Petitioners subject to this new fee include employers with more than 50 employees in the U.S., for which 50% of their workforce is on H and L visas. The fee will remain in effect through September 30, 2014.
USCIS indicated that Vermont Service Center and California Service Center were instructed to hold any H or L petitions sent after that date, pending guidance on how to determine whether the petitioner is subject to the new fee. USCIS will be modifying the I-129 or H-1B Data Collection Form to include information on whether this fee applies.
In the interim, USCIS suggested that petitioners could proactively include a �certification� regarding the fee, including a notation of whether the fee is required in bold capital letters at the top of the cover letter. The sample certification that the petitioner is not obligated to pay the fee would be:
�[Name of employer] has over [insert total US employees] employees in the United States, of whom fewer than [insert number or percent] are H-1B or L nonimmigrants. As such, [name of employer] is not subject to the additional fees required under PL 111-230.�
We will update our readers as we receive more guidance on this new change.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/08/h1b_visa_attorney_understandin.html)
USCIS indicated that Vermont Service Center and California Service Center were instructed to hold any H or L petitions sent after that date, pending guidance on how to determine whether the petitioner is subject to the new fee. USCIS will be modifying the I-129 or H-1B Data Collection Form to include information on whether this fee applies.
In the interim, USCIS suggested that petitioners could proactively include a �certification� regarding the fee, including a notation of whether the fee is required in bold capital letters at the top of the cover letter. The sample certification that the petitioner is not obligated to pay the fee would be:
�[Name of employer] has over [insert total US employees] employees in the United States, of whom fewer than [insert number or percent] are H-1B or L nonimmigrants. As such, [name of employer] is not subject to the additional fees required under PL 111-230.�
We will update our readers as we receive more guidance on this new change.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/08/h1b_visa_attorney_understandin.html)
2010 Lindsay Lohan
IneedAllGreen
06-27 03:29 PM
Yes I have known people done for H1 and H4 both. My friend who was fron MP usually get his H1 from Mumbai. But Last year he got his H1 stamped from Delhi just because he wants to go to Honeymoon there. Hope this helps.
more...
Anders �stberg
April 19th, 2005, 09:41 AM
Upload the image to your gallery here instead and link to it in your post rather than use an attachment. That way you can use larger files.